BMXmuseum.com Forums

Marking. I might participate.

D.F.T.R wrote:

OK... RULES UPDATED... MUSEUM PART PURCHASE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN ELIMINATED.... TIRE RULE ADDED.

Why??? I kind'a liked that part as it pushed me to get a couple things I would not have normally and bring this thing to kick asz level. Heck, I was even gonna get dated brake cables for once!!

mxfan69 wrote:

D.F.T.R wrote:

OK... RULES UPDATED... MUSEUM PART PURCHASE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN ELIMINATED.... TIRE RULE ADDED.

Why??? I kind'a liked that part as it pushed me to get a couple things I would not have normally and bring this thing to kick asz level. Heck, I was even gonna get dated brake cables for once!!

Too many had an issue.. wasn't going to blow up the whole thing over it... Hell, I originally had  three items until nuggett talked me down. Lol.. Guys will have enough on their plate with designing a bike...

Nuggett wrote:

Hrkhotrods wrote:

Sounds like a cool concept but I am a bit reluctant after the last build off with the amount of work time and thought that I put into the build only to get blown off by some bs votes Don't get me wrong I'm certainly not saying that my build was better than anybody elses but when a detailed bike gets blown off for one that's dirty something is wrong

Detail and originality will be main factors in the judging, that's what the idea is all about.

Hrkhotrods, I voted for your Hutch, Mainly beacause you fixed the frame and made the stem otherwise I would not have voted for a pink Hutch. A lot of bikes I picked, I didn't know the builder, I just liked the bike. I'm not a fan of pink builds or Hutch Windstylers but you repaird the frame and made a bad-ass stem so you got a vote from me. Coming into a buildoff with high expectations never seems to work. I didn't think I'd get any votes for my ratty old CW cruiser but I got a few which made me happy.

I would have built the bike regardless but figured I'd enter it in a build off just for the hell of it. Same with this build off. I'm entering just because I picked up a frame and fork and the timing worked. I'll build the bike how I want to regardless so maybe I'll get some votes, maybe I won't.

Last edited by Coco (2012-03-21 3:10pm)

Duke 01 wrote:

you should have included midschools...maybe up to 1999 Just my opinion

+1, i'd enter if i could at least use mid/newschool parts, even if it's on an 80's f/f.

OK...

I might be in with a 24 this time

When do the submissions have to be posted?

Hurcobob wrote:

When do the submissions have to be posted?

Well keep this up for interest until the numbers get up there . I will post the #1 submission then. Plenty of time.

16" wasn't mentioned. Acceptable or no?

Kurt_Rad wrote:

16" wasn't mentioned. Acceptable or no?

OPEN.... ALL BMX CLASSES WITHIN THE ERA.

Last edited by D.F.T.R (2012-03-22 2:38pm)

DFTR, Sorry to bug you again, Just so I got this straight.. Its ok if a bike has been built and submitted to the museum? Id be lookign to enter my 85 GT Mach 1. I built it over the winter (this past winter) A good number of parts were bought here on the museum and the rest were OG to the bike. The finish on it is new but the parts build should fit the criteria. Id need to add a couple things before Id enter it like pads nsuch... What say you buildoff leader?

Read 2a. I'm out. Thanks anyway.